The displacement of people, ideas, and spaces via the pandemic creates an emergence of role reversals. The homeless are being permitted new sites of refuge, the housed are transient, claiming qualitatively different spaces. The city we thought of as stable suddenly has turned into a contentious space. The franchisers, the franchised, and the disenfranchised in our city are vying over emerging territories in the public and private domain. The franchisers are the authorities of public and private domain while the disenfranchised and the franchised are the participants.
When shelters in NYC become insufficient in the time of COVID, the homeless of NYC are bussed from shelters to luxury hotels. Amongst those, the Lucerne in the Upper West Side and many others, are showing an influx of homeless residents.
The locomotive facilitator of New York is not only shipping protesters but facilitating the transience of the homeless. Complaints of invasion are on the rise as the housed get out and the homeless move in. How could zones of erasure mitigate the unspoken blase between the homeless despair and the franchised leisure?
One is transported from hotel to hotel with nowhere else to go, perpetually transient on the tracks of the city’s infrastructure. The mechanical tectonics of the subway suggests a subterranean automation of this disenfranchised transportation with tubes that intersect the subterranean levels of the hotel. These mechanisms emerge as a beacon or a snare, similar to that of the Sirens of Odysseus, these voyages serve as a lure for voyaging homeless sent to a subterranean doom.
By nature of a municipality’s infrastructure systems, this disenfranchised architecture weaves in and out of franchised spaces. These growing edges of inversion are a testament to a franchised membrane becoming porous and more erased.
Where have the homeless been going during the pandemic?